GeForce GTX 670M vs Quadro P2000
When comparing GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro P2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro P2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
5 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P2000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 478 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 5508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 330% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
150−160
250−260
medium / 768p
120−130
220−230
ultra / 1080p
60−65
180−190
QHD / 1440p
35−40
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
90−95
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
9−10
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−11
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 336% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
65−70
180−190
medium / 1080p
27−30
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 232% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
30−35
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 306% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
130−140
high / 1080p
14−16
70−75
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
9−10
low / 720p
14−16
70−75
medium / 1080p
7−8
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
30−33
130−140
medium / 768p
18−20
85−90
high / 1080p
10−12
50−55
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 326% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
55−60
high / 768p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Quadro P2000
Architecture
Fermi
Pascal
Code name
N13E-GS1-LP
GP106
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
22 March 2012
6 February 2017
Pipelines
336
1024
Core clock speed
598 MHz
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
33.5 billion/sec
94.72
Floating-point performance
803.7 gflops
3,031 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
192bit
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72.0 GB/s
140.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
CUDA cores
336
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
53 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price