Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro P2000
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro P2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
5 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P2000 has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 123 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 876 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 258% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 268% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
250−260
medium / 768p
130−140
220−230
ultra / 1080p
65−70
180−190
QHD / 1440p
35−40
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
100−110
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
70−75
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
80−85
medium / 1080p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
70−75
180−190
medium / 1080p
30−35
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 202% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
45−50
QHD / 1440p
3−4
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
30−35
110−120
medium / 1080p
18−20
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 282% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
55−60
130−140
high / 1080p
18−20
70−75
ultra / 1080p
8−9
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 166% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
9−10
low / 720p
18−20
70−75
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 312% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
130−140
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
16−18
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
30−35
130−140
medium / 768p
21−24
85−90
high / 1080p
12−14
50−55
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
55−60
high / 768p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro P2000
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Pascal
Code name
Haswell GT3e
GP106
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
6 February 2017
Pipelines
40
1024
Core clock speed
200 MHz
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1480 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
94.72
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
3,031 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
140.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
