Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro P2000
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro P2000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro P2000.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
5 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P2000 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 776 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
3−4
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 616% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
7−8
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 581% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
250−260
medium / 768p
85−90
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
60−65
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
24−27
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
12−14
80−85
medium / 1080p
6−7
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
8−9
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
14−16
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 368% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
18−20
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−11
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 523% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
140−150
medium / 768p
35−40
130−140
high / 1080p
8−9
70−75
ultra / 1080p
5−6
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 317% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
8−9
70−75
medium / 1080p
5−6
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 680% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
8−9
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 450% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
7−8
50−55
ultra / 1080p
5−6
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 650% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
55−60
high / 768p
30−35
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro P2000
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Pascal
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
GP106
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
6 February 2017
Pipelines
48
1024
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1480 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
94.72
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
3,031 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
140.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price