Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro M3000M vs Quadro P2000

    In this comparison between Quadro M3000M and Quadro P2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M3000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro P2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Quadro M3000M Check Price
    Quadro P2000 Check Price

    Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:

    Quadro M3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro M3000M Quadro P2000
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 5 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
    • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
    • Quadro P2000 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
    • Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
    • Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 26 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
    • Quadro M3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 2008 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 35−40 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 21−24 24−27
    QHD / 1440p 16−18 18−20
    4K / 2160p 10−11 10−11
    low / 720p 60−65 60−65
    medium / 1080p 40−45 45−50
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3% more, than Quadro M3000M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro M3000M Quadro P2000
    Architecture Maxwell Pascal
    Code name GM204 GP106
    Type Mobile workstation Workstation
    Release date 2 October 2015 6 February 2017
    Pipelines 1,024 1024
    Core clock speed 1050 MHz 1076 MHz
    Boost Clock 1480 MHz
    Transistor count 5,200 million 4,400 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 16 nm
    Texture fill rate 67.20 94.72
    Floating-point performance 2,150 gflops 3,031 gflops
    Length 201 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 160 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 7008 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s 140.2 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.0 6.4
    OpenGL 4.5 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA 5.2 6.1
    Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.19 kh/s
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 253 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares