Quadro P2000 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
In this comparison between Quadro P2000 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon PRO WX 2100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P2000
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
5 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P2000 has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Quadro P2000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro P2000 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Quadro P2000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro P2000 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
Quadro P2000 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 1008 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
7−8
ultra / 1080p
24−27
4−5
QHD / 1440p
18−20
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 330% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
55−60
12−14
ultra / 1080p
50−55
10−12
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
65−70
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 337% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
250−260
140−150
medium / 768p
220−230
110−120
ultra / 1080p
180−190
55−60
QHD / 1440p
110−120
30−35
4K / 2160p
70−75
27−30
high / 768p
210−220
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
110−120
60−65
ultra / 1080p
100−110
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
45−50
9−10
ultra / 1080p
40−45
8−9
QHD / 1440p
30−33
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
4−5
low / 720p
80−85
21−24
medium / 1080p
50−55
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 336% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
60−65
16−18
ultra / 1080p
50−55
10−12
QHD / 1440p
30−33
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
65−70
medium / 1080p
110−120
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
45−50
12−14
QHD / 1440p
30−35
2−3
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
110−120
27−30
medium / 1080p
65−70
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 364% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
140−150
55−60
medium / 768p
130−140
50−55
high / 1080p
70−75
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−35
7−8
QHD / 1440p
24−27
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 190% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
21−24
3−4
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
9−10
0−1
low / 720p
70−75
14−16
medium / 1080p
35−40
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 457% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
130−140
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
120−130
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
70−75
14−16
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 281% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
130−140
27−30
medium / 768p
85−90
18−20
high / 1080p
50−55
10−11
ultra / 1080p
27−30
7−8
4K / 2160p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 357% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
55−60
21−24
high / 768p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
Quadro P2000
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Pascal
Polaris
Code name
GP106
Polaris 12
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
6 February 2017
21 March 2018
Pipelines
1024
512
Core clock speed
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1219 MHz
Transistor count
4,400 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
94.72
39.01
Floating-point performance
3,031 gflops
1,248 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
160 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
7008 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
140.2 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price