Quadro P2000 vs Radeon R7 M270DX

In this comparison between Quadro P2000 and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  Quadro P2000 Radeon R7 M270DX
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 IGP
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR5 System Shared
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB
Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort No outputs
  Check Price
  • Quadro P2000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Quadro P2000 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 176 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
  • Quadro P2000 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 35−40 2−3
ultra / 1080p 24−27 0−1
QHD / 1440p 18−20 0−1
4K / 2160p 10−11
low / 720p 60−65 12−14
medium / 1080p 45−50 3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 716% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX.

Full Specs

  Quadro P2000 Radeon R7 M270DX
Architecture Pascal GCN 3.0
Code name GP106 Topaz
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 6 February 2017 11 June 2014
Pipelines 1024 384
Core clock speed 1076 MHz 900 MHz
Boost Clock 1480 MHz 940 MHz
Transistor count 4,400 million 1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 94.72 22.56
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops
Length 201 mm
Memory bus width 160 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth 140.2 GB/s
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_0)
Shader Model 6.4 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131
CUDA 6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.19 kh/s
  Check Price