Quadro P2000 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Quadro P2000 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P2000 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
Quadro P2000
Tesla C2070
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
5 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2070 has 217% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
Quadro P2000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2070 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro P2000 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 502 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Quadro P2000 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2070 is 47 mm longer, than Quadro P2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 4020 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
9−10
QHD / 1440p
18−20
3−4
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 123% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
55−60
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
6−7
4K / 2160p
18−20
5−6
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 124% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro P2000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
180−190
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
60−65
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−35
high / 768p
210−220
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Quadro P2000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
45−50
20−22
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
QHD / 1440p
30−33
18−20
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
40−45
medium / 1080p
50−55
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−33
12−14
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
100−110
medium / 1080p
110−120
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 93% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
10−11
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
110−120
55−60
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
130−140
80−85
high / 1080p
70−75
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
12−14
QHD / 1440p
24−27
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
9−10
1−2
low / 720p
70−75
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 153% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
70−75
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
50−55
21−24
ultra / 1080p
27−30
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
35−40
high / 768p
−
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla C2070.
Full Specs
Quadro P2000
Tesla C2070
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi
Code name
GP106
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
6 February 2017
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1024
448
Core clock speed
1076 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
Transistor count
4,400 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
94.72
32.14
Floating-point performance
3,031 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
201 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
160 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
7008 MHz
2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth
140.2 GB/s
143.4 GB/s
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
6.1
2.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
Check Price
