FireStream 9270 vs Quadro P3200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Quadro P3200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro P3200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6084 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6082 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 42 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 3408 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 566% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 484% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 537% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 360% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 438% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 273% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 276% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 590% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Pascal |
| Code name | RV770 | N18E-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 27 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |