GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro P3200

When choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P3200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P3200.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Quadro P3200 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P3200 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P3200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Quadro P3200 here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Quadro P3200 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro P3200
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6084 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro P3200 has 6083 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 792 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	20−22
4K / 2160p	−	10−12
low / 720p	1−2	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6600% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	55−60
QHD / 1440p	0−1	40−45
4K / 2160p	−	21−24
low / 720p	0−1	110−120
medium / 1080p	−	70−75
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	250−260
medium / 768p	27−30	220−230
ultra / 1080p	7−8	190−200
QHD / 1440p	−	120−130
4K / 2160p	−	80−85
high / 768p	16−18	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 692% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	50−55
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 720p	0−1	85−90
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	−	65−70
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	21−24	190−200
medium / 1080p	0−1	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 786% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	65−70
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	0−1	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	70−75
low / 768p	18−20	140−150
medium / 768p	−	130−140
high / 1080p	0−1	75−80
ultra / 1080p	−	35−40
QHD / 1440p	0−1	27−30
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	110−120
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1337% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	40−45
low / 768p	0−1	140−150
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	−	50−55
ultra / 1080p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	55−60
high / 768p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro P3200
Architecture	G9x	Pascal
Code name	N10E-GS1	N18E-Q1
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 March 2009	27 February 2017
Pipelines	64	1792
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	708 - 1202 MHz
Boost Clock		1228 MHz
Transistor count	505 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	192 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed		7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
Shader Model	4.0
OpenGL	2.1
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	+
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Laptop size	large	large
Optimus		+
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro P3200

GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P3200 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares