GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro P3200
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro P3200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and Quadro P3200.
GeForce GTX 295
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 6084 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 4292 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 295.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 534 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 6009 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 650% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 636% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 642% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 608% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 330% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 710% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | GT200B | N18E-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 27 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |