Quadro 2000D vs Quadro P3200
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Quadro P3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Quadro P3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D | Quadro P3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6084 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6083 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 83 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 4408 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
Quadro 2000D and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 1175% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 487% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 814% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 377% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 1466% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1183% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1280% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D | Quadro P3200 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
Code name | GF106 | N18E-Q1 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 October 2011 | 27 February 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |