Quadro CX vs Quadro P3200
When comparing Quadro CX and Quadro P3200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro CX and Quadro P3200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro CX
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro P3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 6084 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 4548 GB more memory, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 106 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 5408 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 1057% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| Quadro CX and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 212% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Quadro CX and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 1400% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 573% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 962% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 437% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 2250% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 188% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1520% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro CX | Quadro P3200 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | GT200B | N18E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 27 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |