Quadro P3200 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
When choosing between Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 4850 X2, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 5572 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 83 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 5018 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 650% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 636% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 193% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 642% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 400% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 608% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 330% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 710% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | N18E-Q1 | R700 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 February 2017 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |