Quadro P3200 vs Radeon HD 7870 XT
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 7870 XT, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro P3200 stacks up against Radeon HD 7870 XT, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 7870 XT
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6082 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7870 XT.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 7870 XT - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon HD 7870 XT - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7870 XT is 217 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7870 XT - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 1008 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7870 XT.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 7870 XT have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 7870 XT have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 7870 XT have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 7% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 7870 XT have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon HD 7870 XT. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N18E-Q1 | Tahiti |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 February 2017 | 19 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 93.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 346 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 14.5 Mh/s | |
| Check Price |