Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro P3200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro P3200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6082 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 22 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 2408 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 912% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Quadro P3200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 230% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 1400% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 850% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 345% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 1466% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 188% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 860% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1057% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | − | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N18E-Q1 | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 February 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |