Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R5 M435
When comparing Quadro P3200 and Radeon R5 M435, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P3200 and Radeon R5 M435 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 M435
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6082 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 M435 is 72 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 M435 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 2508 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 850% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 1250% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Quadro P3200 and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 223% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Quadro P3200 and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 1500% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 573% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1114% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 473% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 2550% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 188% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1860% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | − | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Radeon R5 M435 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N18E-Q1 | Jet |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 February 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 690 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |