Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R7 A360
When comparing Quadro P3200 and Radeon R7 A360, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P3200 and Radeon R7 A360 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 A360
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6083 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 17 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 7005 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6600% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Quadro P3200 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | − |
4K / 2160p | 80−85 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 692% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro P3200 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 786% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1337% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Radeon R7 A360. |
Full Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | N18E-Q1 | Meso |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 February 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.52 | |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |