Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R7 M365X
When comparing Quadro P3200 and Radeon R7 M365X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P3200 and Radeon R7 M365X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M365X
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6080 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 192 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 6008 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 850% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 1057% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Quadro P3200 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Quadro P3200 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 1400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 573% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1114% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 437% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 2250% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 188% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1100% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1860% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | − | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N18E-Q1 | Litho |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 February 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 690 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.04 | |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |