Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R9 M270X
In this comparison between Quadro P3200 and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P3200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6080 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 17 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 5883 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 406% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 307% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 475% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 583% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 122% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 411% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 478% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N18E-Q1 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 February 2017 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |