Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R9 M375X
When choosing between Quadro P3200 and Radeon R9 M375X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro P3200 and Radeon R9 M375X.
Radeon R9 M375X
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6080 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M375X.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 217 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 5883 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 275% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 102% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 223% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 283% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 157% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 337% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 215% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 305% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N18E-Q1 | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 February 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 40.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |