Quadro P3200 vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro P3200 and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro P3200 stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6081 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 134 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 4008 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 118% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 129% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Quadro P3200 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro P3200 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 108% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 48% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 105% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P3200 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | N18E-Q1 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 February 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |