FirePro M6000 vs Quadro P400

When comparing FirePro M6000 and Quadro P400, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M6000 and Quadro P400 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro M6000 Check Price

Quadro P400 Check Price

FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:

FirePro M6000 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M6000	Quadro P400
Power consumption (TDP)	43 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	3x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M6000 has 43% more power consumption, than Quadro P400.
FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro P400 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro M6000 and Quadro P400 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro P400 - in Desktops.
FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro P400 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P400 is 478 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P400 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M6000 is 492 MHz higher, than Quadro P400.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	7−8
ultra / 1080p	5−6	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	18−20
medium / 1080p	10−12	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 10% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M6000 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	150−160	140−150
medium / 768p	120−130	110−120
ultra / 1080p	65−70	55−60
QHD / 1440p	35−40	30−35
4K / 2160p	27−30	27−30
high / 768p	95−100	85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
medium / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	10−11	9−10
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
4K / 2160p	4−5	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	21−24
medium / 1080p	10−12	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−12
low / 720p	70−75	65−70
medium / 1080p	30−33	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Fortnite is 10% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
medium / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	6−7	5−6
ultra / 1080p	4−5	3−4
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	14−16
medium / 1080p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	95−100	95−100
high / 1080p	95−100	90−95
ultra / 1080p	85−90	80−85
medium / 1080p	95−100	95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
FirePro M6000 and Quadro P400 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	14−16
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	30−35	27−30
medium / 768p	21−24	18−20
high / 1080p	10−12	10−11
ultra / 1080p	7−8	7−8
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	45−50
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
high / 768p	40−45	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro P400.

Full Specs

	FirePro M6000	Quadro P400
Architecture	GCN	Pascal
Code name	Heathrow	GP107
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 July 2012	7 February 2017
Pipelines	640	256
Core clock speed	750 MHz	1228 MHz
Boost Clock		1252 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	32.00	20.03
Floating-point performance	1,024 gflops	679.9 gflops
Length		145 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	4008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	32.06 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA		6.1
Bus support	n/a
Laptop size	medium sized
Form factor	MXM-B
StereoOutput3D	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M6000 vs Quadro P400

FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares