GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro P400

When choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P400, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro P400.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Quadro P400 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro P400
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	3x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro P400.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P400 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P400 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Quadro P400 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro P400 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 272 MHz higher, than Quadro P400.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro P400 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	60−65	140−150
medium / 768p	27−30	110−120
ultra / 1080p	7−8	55−60
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Dota 2 is 158% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	14−16
low / 768p	18−20	55−60
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	27−30
medium / 768p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P400 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro P400
Architecture	G9x	Pascal
Code name	N10E-GS1	GP107
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	2 March 2009	7 February 2017
Pipelines	64	256
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	1228 MHz
Boost Clock		1252 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec	20.03
Floating-point performance	192 gflops	679.9 gflops
Length		145 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed		4008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s	32.06 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Laptop size	large
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro P400

GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares