Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P400

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M2000 and Quadro P400, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M2000 stacks up against Quadro P400, check out specs charts below.

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Quadro P400 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro M2000	Quadro P400
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	3x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M2000 has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro P400.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro P400.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M2000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P400 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P400 is 432 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
Quadro M2000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P400 - by 14 nm process technology.
Quadro M2000 is 56 mm longer, than Quadro P400.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 2604 MHz higher, than Quadro P400.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	7−8
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	24−27	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	30−35	12−14
ultra / 1080p	27−30	10−12
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	65−70	27−30
medium / 1080p	35−40	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	230−240	140−150
medium / 768p	200−210	110−120
ultra / 1080p	120−130	55−60
QHD / 1440p	90−95	30−35
4K / 2160p	50−55	27−30
high / 768p	170−180	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
medium / 768p	100−110	60−65
ultra / 1080p	80−85	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 67% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	24−27	9−10
ultra / 1080p	21−24	8−9
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	4−5
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 145% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	30−35	16−18
ultra / 1080p	24−27	10−12
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	120−130	65−70
medium / 1080p	70−75	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 110% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	35−40	12−14
ultra / 1080p	27−30	12−14
QHD / 1440p	14−16	2−3
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	70−75	27−30
medium / 1080p	40−45	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 178% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	100−110	55−60
medium / 768p	95−100	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	12−14	5−6
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	120−130	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	110−120	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	40−45	14−16
medium / 1080p	21−24	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 127% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	75−80	27−30
medium / 768p	45−50	18−20
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	14−16	7−8
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 142% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
high / 768p	55−60	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro P400.

Full Specs

	Quadro M2000	Quadro P400
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Code name	GM206	GP107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	8 April 2016	7 February 2017
Pipelines	768	256
Core clock speed	796 MHz	1228 MHz
Boost Clock	1163 MHz	1252 MHz
Transistor count	2,940 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	55.82	20.03
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops	679.9 gflops
Length	201 mm	145 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	4008 MHz
Memory bandwidth		32.06 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	5.2	6.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4
nView Desktop Management	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M2000 vs Quadro P400

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares