FirePro S7150 vs Quadro P500
When choosing between FirePro S7150 and Quadro P500, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7150 and Quadro P500.
FirePro S7150
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro P500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro P500.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 535 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 12 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 416% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 313% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro P500. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro P500 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Tonga | GP108 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 14 November 2017 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 21.25 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.0.1 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |