FireStream 9370 vs Quadro P500
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro P500, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Quadro P500, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro P500 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P500 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro P500.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 630 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Quadro P500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 38% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 46% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro P500 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Pascal |
| Code name | Cypress | GP108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 14 November 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 21.25 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.0.1 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |