GRID K220Q vs Quadro P500
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Quadro P500 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro P500 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro P500 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro P500.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 710 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Battlefield 5 is 171% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Dota 2 is 47% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Fortnite is 80% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Minecraft is 31% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 320% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro P500 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | GK104 | GP108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 14 November 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 21.25 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.0.1 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 6.1 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |