GRID K240Q vs Quadro P500
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and Quadro P500. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro P500. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K240Q
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro P500 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro P500 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 710 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro P500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 19% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro P500 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | GK104 | GP108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 14 November 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 21.25 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.0.1 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 6.1 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |