GRID K260Q vs Quadro P500
When comparing GRID K260Q and Quadro P500, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro P500 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Quadro P500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro P500 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 710 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and Quadro P500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 54% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Quadro P500. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Quadro P500 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | GK104 | GP108 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 14 November 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 21.25 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.0.1 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 6.1 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |