GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro P520
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro P520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro P520.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro P520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P520 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro P520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro P520 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro P520 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P520 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P520 is 675 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P520 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P520 is 1992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro P520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro P520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Dota 2 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Fortnite is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P520 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro P520 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | GK106 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |