Quadro P520 vs Radeon Pro 570
In this comparison between Quadro P520 and Radeon Pro 570 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P520 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 570 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 570
Quadro P520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P520 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P520 | Radeon Pro 570 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 570 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro P520.
- Quadro P520 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro 570 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P520 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon Pro 570 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P520 is 303 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 570.
- Quadro P520 and Radeon Pro 570 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 780 MHz higher, than Quadro P520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 227% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Battlefield 5 is 244% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Fortnite is 161% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 226% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P520 | Radeon Pro 570 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | 1105 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 123.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,584 gflops | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6780 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |