Quadro P520 vs Radeon R9 370
In this comparison between Quadro P520 and Radeon R9 370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P520 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 370
Quadro P520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P520 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P520 | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P520 and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro P520 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P520 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P520 is 378 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
- Quadro P520 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P520 is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 227% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 244% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 161% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 226% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro P520. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P520 | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Trinidad | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 78.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |