FirePro S7000 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q

When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro P5200 Max Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Quadro P5200 Max Q.

FirePro S7000

Quadro P5200 Max Q

Main Specs

	FirePro S7000	Quadro P5200 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro P5200 Max Q.
FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro P5200 Max Q uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro P5200 Max Q has 12 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 366 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 2416 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	50−55
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	7−8	27−30
4K / 2160p	5−6	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	75−80
medium / 1080p	27−30	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 131% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	30−35	75−80
ultra / 1080p	27−30	70−75
QHD / 1440p	12−14	55−60
4K / 2160p	8−9	27−30
low / 720p	70−75	130−140
medium / 1080p	35−40	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 140% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P5200 Max Q.
low / 768p	230−240	250−260
medium / 768p	200−210	230−240
ultra / 1080p	120−130	−
QHD / 1440p	95−100	150−160
4K / 2160p	50−55	100−110
high / 768p	170−180	220−230
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Dota 2 is 10% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	24−27	65−70
ultra / 1080p	24−27	60−65
QHD / 1440p	20−22	40−45
4K / 2160p	8−9	21−24
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	30−35	90−95
ultra / 1080p	24−27	70−75
QHD / 1440p	16−18	45−50
4K / 2160p	−	21−24
low / 720p	120−130	220−230
medium / 1080p	75−80	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Fortnite is 110% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	35−40	85−90
ultra / 1080p	27−30	65−70
QHD / 1440p	14−16	50−55
4K / 2160p	14−16	30−35
low / 720p	70−75	130−140
medium / 1080p	40−45	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	100−110	160−170
medium / 768p	95−100	150−160
high / 1080p	40−45	95−100
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
QHD / 1440p	8−9	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 87% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−12	30−35
QHD / 1440p	10−11	24−27
4K / 2160p	3−4	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	95−100
medium / 1080p	18−20	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 168% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
FirePro S7000 and Quadro P5200 Max Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	−	75−80
ultra / 1080p	14−16	55−60
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	70−75	120−130
medium / 1080p	18−20	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 157% more, than FirePro S7000.
high / 1080p	16−18	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
QHD / 1440p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	10−12
low / 720p	40−45	95−100
medium / 1080p	21−24	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 156% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	75−80	180−190
medium / 768p	45−50	120−130
high / 1080p	27−30	70−75
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
4K / 2160p	9−10	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than FirePro S7000.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
medium / 768p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	40−45	65−70
high / 768p	55−60	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in World of Tanks is 43% more, than FirePro S7000.

Full Specs

	FirePro S7000	Quadro P5200 Max Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Pascal
Code name	Pitcairn	GP104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 August 2012	21 February 2018
Pipelines	1280	2560
Core clock speed	950 MHz	1316 MHz
Boost Clock		1569 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	76.00	251.0
Floating-point performance	2,432 gflops
Length	292 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	7216 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	230.9 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA		6.1
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	272 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+

FirePro S7000 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares