FirePro W7170M vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
When comparing FirePro W7170M and Quadro P5200 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7170M and Quadro P5200 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro P5200 Max Q
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Quadro P5200 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 100 Watt.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro P5200 Max Q uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro P5200 Max Q has 12 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 593 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 2216 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P5200 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Dota 2 is 15% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 144% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Fortnite is 114% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 148% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 193% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
FirePro W7170M and Quadro P5200 Max Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 157% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 192% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 172% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in World of Tanks is 43% more, than FirePro W7170M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Quadro P5200 Max Q | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | Pascal |
Code name | Tonga | GP104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 21 February 2018 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1316 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1569 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 251.0 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7216 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 230.9 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon HD 7850
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Radeon HD 7850
- FirePro W7170M vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon R9 FURY X
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Radeon R9 FURY X