Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro P5200 Max Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs stacks up against Quadro P5200 Max Q, check out specs charts below.
Quadro P5200 Max Q
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Quadro P5200 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 916 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 126% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P5200 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 117% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Fortnite is 96% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 113% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 152% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro P5200 Max Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 143% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 156% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 136% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in World of Tanks is 43% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Quadro P5200 Max Q | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Pascal |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | GP104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 21 February 2018 |
Pipelines | 96 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1316 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1569 MHz |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 251.0 | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7216 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 230.9 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 FURY X
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Radeon R9 FURY X