Quadro M1000M vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M1000M and Quadro P5200 Max Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M1000M and Quadro P5200 Max Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro P5200 Max Q
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M1000M | Quadro P5200 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro P5200 Max Q has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro P5200 Max Q uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro P5200 Max Q has 14 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 323 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
- Quadro M1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 2216 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 212% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 234% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
Quadro M1000M and Quadro P5200 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Dota 2 is 26% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 209% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Fortnite is 163% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 140% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 261% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 177% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 217% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 246% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro M1000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro M1000M | Quadro P5200 Max Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
Code name | GM107 | GP104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 21 February 2018 |
Pipelines | 512 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 1316 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | 1569 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 251.0 |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7216 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 230.9 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 6.1 |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |