Quadro M620 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
In this comparison between Quadro M620 and Quadro P5200 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M620 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P5200 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro P5200 Max Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M620 | Quadro P5200 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P5200 Max Q has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
- Quadro P5200 Max Q has 14 GB more memory, than Quadro M620.
- Quadro M620 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - in Desktops.
- Quadro M620 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 298 MHz higher, than Quadro M620.
- Quadro M620 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P5200 Max Q - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 2204 MHz higher, than Quadro M620.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
Quadro M620 and Quadro P5200 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Fortnite is 176% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 146% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 291% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 186% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 217% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Quadro M620. |
Full Specs
Quadro M620 | Quadro P5200 Max Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
Code name | GP104 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 January 2017 | 21 February 2018 |
Pipelines | 512 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 1018 MHz | 1316 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1569 MHz | |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 251.0 | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7216 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 230.9 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |