Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Radeon R9 M395
In this comparison between Quadro P5200 Max Q and Radeon R9 M395 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P5200 Max Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro P5200 Max Q
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P5200 Max Q | Radeon R9 M395 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P5200 Max Q has 12 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395.
- Quadro P5200 Max Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
- Quadro P5200 Max Q is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 482 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
- Quadro P5200 Max Q is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P5200 Max Q is 5966 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P5200 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Fortnite is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 53% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro P5200 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 95% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 51% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M395. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | − | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P5200 Max Q in World of Tanks is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M395. |
Full Specs
Quadro P5200 Max Q | Radeon R9 M395 | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN |
Code name | GP104 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 21 February 2018 | 9 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 834 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1569 MHz | |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5000 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 251.0 | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7216 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 230.9 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Radeon R9 FURY X
- Radeon R9 M395 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
- Radeon R9 M395 vs Radeon R9 FURY X
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Quadro P5200 Max Q vs Radeon Sky 500
- Radeon R9 M395 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Radeon R9 M395 vs Radeon Sky 500