Quadro P5200 vs Radeon PRO WX 9100
When comparing Quadro P5200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P5200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon PRO WX 9100
Quadro P5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P5200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P5200 | Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 230 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon PRO WX 9100 has 130% more power consumption, than Quadro P5200.
- Quadro P5200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have maximum RAM of 16 GB.
- Quadro P5200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon PRO WX 9100 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P5200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 9100 - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P5200 is 116 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 9100.
- Quadro P5200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 9100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P5200 is 5326 MHz higher, than Radeon PRO WX 9100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Quadro P5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Battlefield 5 is 7% more, than Quadro P5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro P5200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
Quadro P5200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
Quadro P5200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
Quadro P5200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Quadro P5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 240−250 | 250−260 |
medium / 1080p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Quadro P5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
low / 720p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Quadro P5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
high / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro P5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Quadro P5200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
Quadro P5200 and Radeon PRO WX 9100 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than Quadro P5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Quadro P5200. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Quadro P5200. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 9100 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Quadro P5200. |
Full Specs
Quadro P5200 | Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 11 January 2017 | 10 July 2017 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1569 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7216 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |