Quadro P600 vs Radeon R9 270X

In this comparison between Quadro P600 and Radeon R9 270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P600 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  Quadro P600 Radeon R9 270X
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 180 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2 x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Radeon R9 270X has 350% more power consumption, than Quadro P600.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • Quadro P600 and Radeon R9 270X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Quadro P600 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 270X - with GCN.
  • Quadro P600 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 270X - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 16−18 24−27
ultra / 1080p 10−11 14−16
QHD / 1440p 4−5 10−11
4K / 2160p 6−7
low / 720p 35−40 45−50
medium / 1080p 21−24 30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than Quadro P600.

Full Specs

  Quadro P600 Radeon R9 270X
Architecture Pascal GCN
Code name GP107 Curacao XT
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 14 November 2017 8 October 2013
Pipelines 384 1280
Core clock speed 1430 MHz
Boost Clock 1620 MHz 1050 MHz
Transistor count 3,300 million 2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 37.37 84.00
Floating-point performance 1,117 gflops 2,688 gflops
Length 145 mm
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth 64.13 GB/s 179.2 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.4 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.2.131 +
CUDA 6.1
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 318 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
TrueAudio +
Design reference
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
DDMA audio +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 163 Sol/s
AppAcceleration +
LiquidVR +
TressFX +
UVD +
  Check Price Check Price