GRID K160Q vs Quadro P620

In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Quadro P620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro P620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K160Q

Quadro P620 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro P620
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	40 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 225% more power consumption, than Quadro P620.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro P620 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P620 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P620 is 327 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P620 is 4218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	9−10	35−40
medium / 1080p	1−2	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	1−2	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	8−9	60−65
medium / 1080p	2−3	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K160Q and Quadro P620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	220−230
medium / 768p	75−80	190−200
ultra / 1080p	30−35	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	80−85
4K / 2160p	9−10	40−45
high / 768p	50−55	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 169% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	110−120
medium / 768p	35−40	100−110
ultra / 1080p	14−16	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Dota 2 is 147% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	6−7	45−50
medium / 1080p	1−2	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Far Cry 5 is 800% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	110−120
medium / 1080p	3−4	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	10−12	65−70
medium / 1080p	3−4	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	100−105
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3600% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	65−70
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1400% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	40−45
high / 768p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro P620
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Code name	GK107	GP107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	27 May 2019
Pipelines	192	512
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost Clock		1442 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	43.33
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,490 gflops
Length		145 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	80.13 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0	6.1
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Quadro P620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares