Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro P620
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro P620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro P620
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
40 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro P620 has 166% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro P620 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than Quadro P620.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro P620 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro P620 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P620 is 877 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro P620 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−33
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
30−33
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
150−160
220−230
medium / 768p
120−130
190−200
ultra / 1080p
60−65
110−120
QHD / 1440p
35−40
80−85
4K / 2160p
27−30
40−45
high / 768p
90−95
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
65−70
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Dota 2 is 52% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
7−8
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Far Cry 5 is 127% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−33
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
110−120
medium / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
2−3
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
100−105
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 76% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
5−6
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
30−35
65−70
medium / 768p
20−22
40−45
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro P620
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Pascal
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GP107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
27 May 2019
Pipelines
48
512
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1177 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1442 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
43.33
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
1,490 gflops
Length
145 mm
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.13 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
