Quadro P620 vs Tesla C2075

In this comparison between Quadro P620 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P620 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro P620 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro P620	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 517% more power consumption, than Quadro P620.
Quadro P620 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro P620.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro P620 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro P620 is 603 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro P620 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 103 mm longer, than Quadro P620.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P620 is 2868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−11
QHD / 1440p	5−6	4−5
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	30−33	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	9−10	6−7
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
low / 720p	60−65	55−60
medium / 1080p	30−35	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro P620 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	220−230	210−220
medium / 768p	190−200	190−200
ultra / 1080p	110−120	100−110
QHD / 1440p	80−85	65−70
4K / 2160p	40−45	30−35
high / 768p	160−170	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro P620 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	75−80	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	18−20	18−20
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
low / 720p	45−50	45−50
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	30−33	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	110−120	110−120
medium / 1080p	65−70	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	12−14	10−11
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	60−65
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	100−105	90−95
medium / 768p	85−90	80−85
high / 1080p	35−40	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
QHD / 1440p	5−6	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−12
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
Quadro P620 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
medium / 768p	40−45	35−40
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	Quadro P620	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GP107	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 May 2019	25 July 2011
Pipelines	512	448
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1442 MHz
Transistor count	3,300 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	43.33	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,490 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	145 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.13 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro P620 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares