GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile will be the best choice, for others Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile or Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q here:

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 60 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q has 20% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile is used in Laptops, and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q are build with Turing architecture.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile is 750 MHz higher, than Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q.
  • GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile and Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q are manufactured by 12 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 40−45 40−45
ultra / 1080p 24−27 27−30
QHD / 1440p 20−22 21−24
4K / 2160p 10−12 12−14
low / 720p 65−70 65−70
medium / 1080p 45−50 50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 1650 Ti mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
Architecture Turing Turing
Code name N18P-G62 N19E-Q1 MAX-Q
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Release date 2 April 2020 27 May 2019
Pipelines 1024 1920
Core clock speed 1350 MHz 600 - 870 MHz
Boost Clock 1485 MHz 1215 - 1380 MHz
Transistor count 6,600 million 10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Texture fill rate 95.04 175.0
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 448.0 GB/s
Shared memory - -
G-SYNC support +
VR Ready +
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model 6.5 6.5
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.2.140 1.2.131
CUDA 7.5 7.5
Laptop size medium sized large
  Check Price Check Price