FirePro S7000 vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Quadro T1000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T1000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro T1000 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 155 MHz higher, than Quadro T1000 Max Q.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 3200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Quadro T1000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S7000 and Quadro T1000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 59% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 58% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro S7000. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Pitcairn | N19P-Q1 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 795 / 1230 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |