FirePro V5800 vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and Quadro T1000 Max Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro T1000 Max Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 105 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 109% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 292% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 45% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Turing |
| Code name | Juniper | N19P-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 795 / 1230 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |