GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro T1000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 960A will be the best choice, for others Quadro T1000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 960A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 234 MHz higher, than Quadro T1000 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 2988 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 195% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | GM107 | N19P-Q1 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 795 / 1230 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Quadro T1000 Max Q vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Quadro T1000 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Tesla T4
- Quadro T1000 Max Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Quadro T1000 Max Q vs Tesla T4