Quadro T1000 Max Q vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro T1000 Max Q and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro T1000 Max Q and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 Max Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro T1000 Max Q.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 221 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Quadro T1000 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 4868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 314% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 Max Q | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Code name | N19P-Q1 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |