Quadro T1000 mobile vs Radeon R9 Nano
In this comparison between Quadro T1000 mobile and Radeon R9 Nano you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T1000 mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 Nano will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 mobile
Radeon R9 Nano
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
175 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 Nano has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro T1000 mobile and Radeon R9 Nano have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro T1000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 Nano - in Desktops.
Quadro T1000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 Nano - with GCN 1.2.
Quadro T1000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 Nano - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 mobile is 7500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 Nano.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
QHD / 1440p
21−24
27−30
4K / 2160p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
80−85
medium / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 24% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
high / 1080p
65−70
80−85
ultra / 1080p
55−60
70−75
QHD / 1440p
40−45
55−60
4K / 2160p
21−24
30−33
low / 720p
120−130
130−140
medium / 1080p
75−80
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
Quadro T1000 mobile and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
230−240
230−240
ultra / 1080p
200−210
−
QHD / 1440p
130−140
150−160
4K / 2160p
85−90
100−110
high / 768p
220−230
220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
medium / 1080p
50−55
50−55
Quadro T1000 mobile and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
high / 1080p
50−55
65−70
ultra / 1080p
50−55
60−65
QHD / 1440p
30−35
40−45
4K / 2160p
16−18
21−24
low / 720p
90−95
100−110
medium / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Far Cry 5 is 24% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
high / 1080p
70−75
95−100
ultra / 1080p
55−60
75−80
QHD / 1440p
35−40
45−50
4K / 2160p
21−24
21−24
low / 720p
190−200
220−230
medium / 1080p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
high / 1080p
70−75
85−90
ultra / 1080p
55−60
70−75
QHD / 1440p
35−40
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
low / 720p
120−130
140−150
medium / 1080p
75−80
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Forza Horizon 4 is 24% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
low / 768p
150−160
160−170
medium / 768p
140−150
150−160
high / 1080p
80−85
100−110
ultra / 1080p
35−40
50−55
QHD / 1440p
30−33
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
high / 1080p
30−35
40−45
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
QHD / 1440p
20−22
24−27
4K / 2160p
10−12
14−16
low / 720p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
4K / 2160p
120−130
−
Quadro T1000 mobile and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
60−65
80−85
ultra / 1080p
40−45
55−60
4K / 2160p
18−20
18−20
low / 720p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
65−70
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
high / 1080p
30−33
35−40
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−12
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
12−14
low / 720p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 24% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
low / 768p
150−160
190−200
medium / 768p
100−110
130−140
high / 1080p
55−60
75−80
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
4K / 2160p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
medium / 768p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
60−65
65−70
high / 768p
80−85
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro T1000 mobile.
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 mobile
Radeon R9 Nano
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.2
Code name
N19P-Q1
Fiji
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
27 May 2019
10 September 2015
Pipelines
768
4096
Core clock speed
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1000 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
69.84
256.0
Floating-point performance
8,192 gflops
Length
152 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
4096 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
512 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
+
CUDA
7.5
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Laptop size
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
TrueAudio
+
ZeroCore
+
Mantle
+
Design
reference
Bridgeless CrossFire
+
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
VCE
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
295 Sol/s
Compute units
64
AppAcceleration
+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
FRTC
+
Check Price
Check Price