FirePro W7170M vs Quadro T1000
When comparing FirePro W7170M and Quadro T1000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7170M and Quadro T1000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro T1000
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7170M has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 672 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7170M and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W7170M and Quadro T1000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 93% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro W7170M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | Turing |
Code name | Tonga | TU117 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |